top of page

Lipstick Is Not Just Lipstick: How FDA and Health Canada Classify Lip Products

Writer: Alok Naik, MS- Regulatory Affairs
Alok Naik, MS- Regulatory Affairs
4 hours ago
8 min read

A lipstick looks like the simplest product in a cosmetics line. One formula, one tube, a row of shades. Regulators see something else: a product that sits on a mucous membrane, is partly ingested every time it is worn, carries the heaviest pigment load of any cosmetic, and frequently borrows claims from the drug world. That combination makes lip products one of the most classification-sensitive categories in both the United States and Canada, and one of the easiest for a foreign brand to get wrong.

 

This guide walks through the main types of lip products, how the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates them under MoCRA, how Health Canada regulates them under the Cosmetic Regulations, and the points where a lip product stops being a cosmetic altogether in each country.

 

The lip product family

 

"Lip products" is a shelf category, not a regulatory one. The main types are:

 

  • Lipsticks — stick, liquid, matte, satin and long-wear formats; the most pigment-dense products in the category.

  • Lip glosses — shine products with lower pigment loads, often in tubes or wands.

  • Lip stains and tints — designed to leave color after the vehicle wears off.

  • Lip liners and pencils — used at the lip border; regulated the same way as the lipsticks they accompany.

  • Lip balms — moisturizing products, plain, tinted, flavored, or with SPF or medicinal ingredients.

  • Lip oils — oil-based shine and conditioning products.

  • Lip scrubs and exfoliants — rinse-off or leave-on products with abrasive or chemical exfoliants.

  • Lip masks — leave-on intensive treatments, often overnight.

  • Lip plumpers — products sold on a temporary fullness effect, usually via irritant or circulation-enhancing ingredients.

  • Lip primers — base products worn under color.

 

Every one of these is a cosmetic in both countries when it is sold to cleanse, moisturize, or beautify. The differences start with what is in them and what the label claims.

 

United States: the MoCRA baseline

 

Under the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA), a lip brand selling into the US, domestic or foreign, carries the same core duties as any cosmetics brand:

 

  • Facility registration. Every facility that manufactures or processes cosmetics for the US market must register with FDA. A foreign facility must also designate a US agent.

  • Product listing. The responsible person (the manufacturer, packer or distributor whose name is on the label) must list each cosmetic product with FDA, including its ingredients.

  • Safety substantiation. The responsible person must hold adequate substantiation that each product is safe.

  • Adverse event records and reporting. Serious adverse events must be reported to FDA, and records kept and accessible.

 

MoCRA does not pre-approve cosmetics, and there is no FDA approval for a lipstick. But MoCRA is only the baseline. Three lip-specific issues sit on top of it.

 

1. Color additives: the rule that breaks foreign formulas

 

In the US, a color additive may be used in a cosmetic only if FDA has listed it for that specific intended use. This is stricter than most brands expect, in two ways:

 

  • Approval is use-specific. The regulatory definition of "externally applied" cosmetics expressly does not include the lips or any surface covered by mucous membrane. A color approved for externally applied cosmetics therefore cannot be used in a lipstick unless its listing regulation specifically permits use in lip products. A color that is perfectly legal in a blush or a body lotion can make a lipstick adulterated.

  • Many lip colors must be batch-certified. Color additives listed in 21 CFR Parts 74 and 82, which include the workhorse FD&C and D&C reds used in lipsticks and their lakes, must be analyzed and certified by FDA batch by batch before use. This applies equally to imported products and imported bulk color. A European or Asian pigment supplier's certificate is not a substitute.

 

This is the single most common failure point we see in imported lip formulas: a shade that is compliant in its home market uses a color, or a lake of a color, that FDA has not listed for lip use, or that arrives without batch certification.

 

2. Lead: no one adds it, everyone must control it

 

Lead is never an intentional ingredient in lipstick. It arrives as a trace impurity in mineral pigments and raw materials, and because lip products are partly ingested, they get more scrutiny than almost any other cosmetic.

 

FDA's draft guidance recommends a maximum of 10 parts per million (ppm) of lead as an impurity in cosmetic lip products and externally applied cosmetics, and FDA's own surveys found more than 99 percent of tested products already below that level. Treat 10 ppm as the working ceiling for the US market, and hold the test results to prove it. Separately, California's Proposition 65 lists lead, and lip products have a long history of Proposition 65 notices, so a product that passes FDA's benchmark still needs its California position checked.

 

3. The drug line: where lip products leave MoCRA

 

Some lip products are not regulated as cosmetics at all, or are regulated as both a drug and a cosmetic. Once a lip product is a drug, MoCRA is no longer the framework: the facility registers as a drug establishment, the product is listed as a drug, and the label carries Drug Facts.

 

  • SPF lip balm. Sun protection is a drug claim in the US. A lip balm with an SPF value is an over-the-counter drug (typically a drug-cosmetic combination), not a MoCRA-only product.

  • Medicated balms. Products claiming to heal cold sores or fever blisters, relieve pain, or protect cracked lips with medicinal positioning fall under the OTC drug monographs for external analgesics and skin protectants.

  • Lip plumpers. A claim to moisturize or add shine is a cosmetic claim. A claim to physically increase lip size or alter lip structure is a drug claim, and products marketed that way have drawn FDA attention.

  • Anti-aging and repair claims. Wording that promises to repair tissue, restore collagen, or change the structure of the lips moves a product toward drug classification regardless of its format.

 

The practical consequence: a brand's lip balm can need a drug program while its lipstick needs only MoCRA, and the two cannot be filed the same way.

 

Canada: notification, shades, and the same drug line

 

Canada regulates cosmetics under the Food and Drugs Act and the Cosmetic Regulations, administered by Health Canada. The framework is different from MoCRA in structure, and in one respect noticeably more forgiving.

 

The Cosmetic Notification Form (CNF)

 

A cosmetic must be notified to Health Canada by submitting a Cosmetic Notification Form within 10 days after the product is first sold in Canada. The notification identifies the product, its ingredients, and the Canadian notifier. Since March 2025, the CNF requires a Canadian address in Section 4, so a foreign brand with no Canadian presence needs a Canadian representative in place before it can file properly.

 

The shade rule

 

Here is where Canada is kinder than brands assume. Shades of the same base formula do not each need their own notification. One CNF covers the base product, with the shade variations listed under "Other product names." Twenty-one shades of one lipstick formula are one notification, not twenty-one. Filing each shade separately wastes fees; failing to connect a genuinely different base formula to its own notification creates a compliance gap. The line is the base formula, not the color.

 

(If shades are added after the original filing, the notification is amended under section 31 of the Cosmetic Regulations.)

 

Hotlist and heavy metals

 

Every ingredient is screened against Health Canada's Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist: prohibited ingredients cannot be used at all, and restricted ingredients must meet their conditions. For lip products, the heavy-metal impurity guidance matters as much as the Hotlist. Health Canada treats heavy metal impurities as technically avoidable above these levels in finished cosmetics: lead 10 ppm, arsenic 3 ppm, cadmium 3 ppm, mercury 1 ppm, and antimony 5 ppm. Products above those levels are assessed case by case. As in the US, pigment sourcing and test records are the practical answer.

 

Labeling

 

Canadian cosmetic labels must be bilingual (English and French), declare ingredients using INCI names, show the net quantity, and identify the manufacturer or distributor with a Canadian address. A US label, however compliant at home, is not a Canadian label.

 

Canada's drug line

 

Canada draws the same line as the US, but with its own split. A lip balm with an SPF claim is a secondary sunscreen in Canada: if its UV filters are mineral (such as titanium dioxide or zinc oxide), it is generally regulated as a natural health product and needs a Natural Product Number (NPN); if it uses synthetic UV filters, it is a non-prescription drug and needs a Drug Identification Number (DIN). Either way it is not notified as a cosmetic with a CNF, and the number must be in place before sale. Therapeutic claims, such as cold sore treatment, likewise take a lip product into the drug or natural health product framework.

 

Classification at a glance

 

Product

United States

Canada

Lipstick, gloss, liner or stain

Cosmetic. MoCRA listing. Colors must be FDA-listed for lips; some batch-certified

Cosmetic. One CNF per base formula, shades listed

Lip balm, plain or tinted

Cosmetic

Cosmetic. CNF required

SPF lip balm

OTC drug. Drug Facts label and drug listing

NPN (mineral filters) or DIN (synthetic). No CNF

Medicated or cold-sore balm

OTC drug

Drug or natural health product

Lip plumper

Cosmetic for moisture or shine; drug for bigger lips

Same split as the US

Lip scrub, oil or mask

Cosmetic, unless it claims to treat

Cosmetic (CNF), unless it claims to treat

 

Mistakes we see most often

 

  1. Assuming a shade range is either one product or twenty separate filings, without checking which. In Canada it is one notification per base formula. In the US, the listing work follows the formulation, and the color additive check is per shade.

  2. Clearing the formula but not the colors. The ingredient list can be impeccable while a single pigment or lake is not FDA-listed for lip use or lacks batch certification.

  3. Treating the SPF balm as part of the cosmetics filing. It is a drug in the US, and an NPN or DIN product in Canada. It will not be fixed by a MoCRA listing or a CNF.

  4. No lead file. Both countries work to a 10 ppm lead benchmark for lip products. Brands that cannot produce test results on request are exposed in both markets.

  5. One label for both countries. Canada requires bilingual INCI labeling. The US requires its own responsible-person and MoCRA particulars. Budget for two labels from the start.

 

How Axentra handles lip lines

 

We act as the regulatory department for foreign cosmetics brands across both markets:

 

 

If you are planning a lip launch, an Amazon listing, or a shade-range expansion into the US or Canada, send us the formulas and the claims you want to make. We will tell you exactly what each product needs.

 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating

Stay in the know

Join our email list and get access to important updates curated only for  our subscribers.

bottom of page